<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bioethike &#187; Totally off the wall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bioethike.com/category/totally-off-the-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bioethike.com</link>
	<description>Examining bioethics, morality, and culture from a distinctively orthodox Lutheran perspective. Site dedicated to the Holy Family.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Taipei woman to marry herself</title>
		<link>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2010%2F10%2F23%2Ftaipei-woman-to-marry-herself%2F&#038;seed_title=Taipei+woman+to+marry+herself</link>
		<comments>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2010%2F10%2F23%2Ftaipei-woman-to-marry-herself%2F&#038;seed_title=Taipei+woman+to+marry+herself#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert C. Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Totally off the wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethike.com/?p=2694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Er, no. The Shanghai Daily reports: CHEN Wei-yih has posed for a set of photos in a flowing white dress, enlisted a wedding planner and rented a banquet hall for a marriage celebration with 30 friends. But there is no groom. Chen will marry herself. Uninspired by the men she&#8217;s met but facing social pressure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, no. The <a href="http://www.shanghaidaily.com/article/?id=452435&amp;type=National">Shanghai Daily</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>
CHEN  Wei-yih has posed for a set of photos in a flowing white dress,  enlisted a wedding planner and rented a banquet hall for a marriage  celebration with 30 friends. But there is no groom. Chen will marry herself.</p>
<p>Uninspired  by the men she&#8217;s met but facing social pressure to get married, the  30-year-old Taipei office worker will hold the reception next month in  honor of just one person. &#8220;Age 30 is a prime period for me. My  work and experience are in good shape, but I haven&#8217;t found a partner, so  what can I do?&#8221; Chen said.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Poor lady. I feel sorry for her. The &#8220;wedding&#8221; won&#8217;t be legal, of course, but neither would a divorce.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that she can keep herself together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2010%2F10%2F23%2Ftaipei-woman-to-marry-herself%2F&#038;seed_title=Taipei+woman+to+marry+herself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lutheran natural law book to appear January, 2011</title>
		<link>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2010%2F10%2F22%2Flutheran-natural-law-book-to-appear-january-2011%2F&#038;seed_title=Lutheran+natural+law+book+to+appear+January%2C+2011</link>
		<comments>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2010%2F10%2F22%2Flutheran-natural-law-book-to-appear-january-2011%2F&#038;seed_title=Lutheran+natural+law+book+to+appear+January%2C+2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert C. Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Totally off the wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethike.com/?p=2687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Bioethike friends and readership, Thank you for your patience as you have waited for the next posts from bioethike.com. I have been feverishly working on a very special project entitled, Natural Law: A Lutheran Reappraisal, which will be released by Concordia Publishing House January, 2011. I know that some of you have been waiting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Bioethike friends and readership,</p>
<p>Thank you for your patience as you have waited for the next posts  from bioethike.com. I have been feverishly working on a very special  project entitled, <em>Natural Law: A Lutheran Reappraisal</em>, which will be released by <a href="http://www.cph.org/">Concordia Publishing House</a> January, 2011.</p>
<p>I know that some of you have been waiting for the day when Lutherans,  in a big way, were going to start talking about natural law again.  Well, <em>Deo volente</em>, that day will be in January.</p>
<p>Sixteen Lutheran scholars, teachers, and pastors from the US and  Germany (representing five Lutheran denominations, including the LCMS,  SELK, ELS, NALC, and ELCA) take a look this doctrine with a fresh pair  of eyes. (Spoiler: the opinions about natural law will run the gamut,  from the standard fare to the highly supportive. I envision <em>Natural Law </em>being a “conversation starter” for further discussion about why this doctrine has all but vanished in the Lutheran Church.)</p>
<p>The book will also be controversial. While old themes will be  addressed, some authors have plowed new ground and provide fresh  interpretations of Luther and his views on natural law. Some critiques  of the current disavowal of natural law within Lutheranism are quite  provocative. Topics such as abortion, marriage and family, and human  sexuality are frankly discussed. Additionally, since current and former  teaching theologians of the ELCA have authored several essays in the  book, you’re sure to find some candid commentary about what has happened  to that organization.</p>
<p>In short, I hope that you will agree with some ecumenical academicians who have previewed <em>Natural Law</em>: They are excited that Lutherans finally have rejoined the conversation.</p>
<p>And now, to quote Forest Gump, “That’s all I have to say about that.”</p>
<p>Again, thanks for your patience.</p>
<p>Robert</p>
<p>P.S. Oh, before I forget, based on some research I’ve been doing  recently  I’ve updated “Bakernitions” in bioethike.com. My essay in <em>Natural Law</em> will bring up some of those, so some of what you find in the book may sound familiar. <img src="../wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2010%2F10%2F22%2Flutheran-natural-law-book-to-appear-january-2011%2F&#038;seed_title=Lutheran+natural+law+book+to+appear+January%2C+2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It sounds like a bad prequel</title>
		<link>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2009%2F04%2F08%2Fits-sounds-like-a-bad-prequel%2F&#038;seed_title=It+sounds+like+a+bad+prequel</link>
		<comments>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2009%2F04%2F08%2Fits-sounds-like-a-bad-prequel%2F&#038;seed_title=It+sounds+like+a+bad+prequel#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert C. Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Totally off the wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethike.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anybody remember the 2003 movie The Core? The government has to build a special machine to drill down to the earth&#8217;s core in order to fix a &#8220;military industrial complex/science experiment&#8221; gone awry. Now it seems Obama administration science advisors are suggesting that we &#8220;geoengineer&#8221; the planet in order to reduce global warming. Sound cool? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Anybody remember the 2003 movie <strong>The Core</strong>? The government has to build a special machine to drill down to the earth&#8217;s core in order to fix a &#8220;military industrial complex/science experiment&#8221; gone awry.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Now it seems Obama administration science advisors are suggesting that we &#8220;geoengineer&#8221; the planet in order to reduce global warming. Sound cool? Wait until you read this: <strong>They&#8217;re thinking about shooting pollution up into the outer atmosphere.  </strong>You can read today&#8217;s funny paper <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97ECHLG1&amp;show_article=1">here</a>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Y-m2v5njDg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Y-m2v5njDg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p>HT: Wesley J. Smith at <a href="http://www.wesleyjsmith.com">Secondhand Smoke</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2009%2F04%2F08%2Fits-sounds-like-a-bad-prequel%2F&#038;seed_title=It+sounds+like+a+bad+prequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A dung beetle is no 90-pound weakling</title>
		<link>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2009%2F03%2F24%2Fa-dung-beetle-is-no-90-pound-weakling%2F&#038;seed_title=A+dung+beetle+is+no+90-pound+weakling</link>
		<comments>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2009%2F03%2F24%2Fa-dung-beetle-is-no-90-pound-weakling%2F&#038;seed_title=A+dung+beetle+is+no+90-pound+weakling#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert C. Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Totally off the wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vain attempt at humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethike.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting piece from The New York Times on the evolution (read: creational development) of animal weaponry. Seems men aren&#8217;t too much unlike the dung beetle after all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/science/24armo.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;hpw">piece</a> from <em>The New York Times</em> on the evolution (read: creational development) of animal weaponry. Seems men aren&#8217;t too much unlike the dung beetle after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bioethike.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fbioethike.com%2F2009%2F03%2F24%2Fa-dung-beetle-is-no-90-pound-weakling%2F&#038;seed_title=A+dung+beetle+is+no+90-pound+weakling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

